3440x1440 vs 4k performance The wider screen, and better performance made the experience better than any I’d had on 4K With a 6800? Not much. 3440x1440's visual experience is closer to 2560x1440 than to 4k basically, i think you got your answer but what im trying to do is if you are going to 3440x1440 thinking its 4k, its not. Just looking for a rough percentage if anyone has any ideas? From my rough maths, that's a 35% overall decrease in total pixel count so would it be fair to assume a 10-20% increased performance overhead for games? As most people stated it's generally slightly below 4k benchmarks. Some games it's less, some games it's more. 0 / 3. I heard lots of pluses for ultrawide in terms of immersion but 4k also offers that sweet pixel density. 4K DLSS looks significantly better than DLAA. The point I was trying to make but didn't really get across is you can have a card that's great at 3440x1440 but still sucks at 4K. Should you buy an Ultrawide gaming monitor, and was I wrong?Thank you to Ruipro for sponsoring this video!Buy the Ruipro HDMI 2. Refresh Rate. A bonus you get without losing all the FPS true 4k would cause. 4k monitor is suitable for photographers, web designers, and video editors because it is used to view high-resolution images. c. Reply reply We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. GPUs are currently a fair way off from providing the FPS I want in the games I play at just regular 4k, let alone ultrawide 4k. Easiest way to get a ballpark is to get a pixel count, compare that to the pixel count of 4K, use that to gauge the performance of games based on 4K benchmarks. Given the choice, and given that you have a 2080 Super, I would go with 3440x1440. On AMD for modern titles just enable FSR for a performance increase, you will probably have the option on most games. Nov 24, 2023 · ウルトラワイドのアスペクト比は21:9で、4Kの16:9の標準的な画面幅よりも広い。 価格： 一般的に、4Kモニターは3440 x 1440モニターよりも安い傾向にある。これは、4Kモニターが広く出回っていることと、ウルトラワイド解像度の方が画面が大きいためだ。 Jan 4, 2022 · 4. 5MP: Discover the differences between 5MP and 4K resolutions in security Dec 28, 2024 · It’s a similar story with 4K 240Hz monitors and 1440p 360Hz or 480Hz models. Sep 17, 2020 · At 4K, the RTX 3080 performed up to a whopping 80 percent faster than its RTX 2080 predecessor in some games. The 7900 XT is tied overall (vs. 4k is huge resolution, bit a 3070 can probably run most games on it, and it is 16:9. 60hz really isn't bad at all, in fact you only really notice it in fast moving FPS games, everything else is fairly fine. Users considering a move to 4K should assess their current hardware’s capabilities to ensure a seamless transition. com/vg/-win10Office 2016 -- https://www. com/vg/-2016 Office 2019 -- h Nov 23, 2023 · UltraWide resolution typically has almost 5 million pixels, while 4K has over 8 million pixels in its resolution – UltraWide resolution has approximately 60% of the pixel count of the 4K. 4k monitors can still be versatile if you need something for gaming and office work, but they cost more than 1440p monitors, so only go for these I wanted to get some opinions on the 4090 is a GPU for ultrawide 1440p and not 4k. 3 million pixels, making it more intensive on the GPU than lower-resolution 3440x1440 UltraWides. Really 1440p 21:9 isn’t that much more than 16:9 on the scale of it, and even the 5120*1440p super-ultrawides have less pixels than 4K. Balancing specs and performance against price, this is a compelling near-budget graphics card option that works Nov 6, 2022 · A 32” 4k monitor has a resolution of 3840X2160 whereas a 34” ultrawide monitor has 3440X1440. What is screen real estate? 4k vs Super Ultrawide. Would love to hear testimonials from people that preferably have experience with both. To s Contrast is ok. Die Klarheit von kaltem Licht: Ein umfassender Leitfaden Die Bedeutung und Sicherheitsvorteile des Einschaltens der Außenbeleuchtung Oct 25, 2022 · The 4K Ultra HD resolution features 3840×2160 pixels, over three million pixels more than 3440×1440 (the most popular ultrawide resolution). 29 Mega Pixels total (160 ppi @ 27" of 3840x2160) making for a difference of ~67% more pixels with 4K, meaning a 67% FPS improvement in favor of the 3440x1440 monitor. 4K-Auflösung bietet eine unglaublich scharfe und klare Bildqualität, mit lebendigen Farben und tiefem Schwarz. With ten games in-hand, we're going to explore which cards will deliver the kind of performance you're looking Been there done that, Still got 2 3080 10gb & 12gb, LG 34" 3440x1440 144hz I forget the number but HDR400 (Best HDR monitor to date) e. 3840x2160 (4k) is NOT ultrawide, but is more demanding on the GPU than any of Mar 31, 2021 · To keep up with such performance in 4K you must have top end CPU and at least RTX 3800 / RX 6800 and above GPU. For the price of a 4K 60Hz monitor, however, you can get a 1440p 144Hz display, which will provide you with a significantly more responsive and enjoyable gaming experience. Sep 25, 2020 · Here’s the thing though: Most gamers shouldn’t buy the GeForce RTX 3090. 25x running DLSS Quality (internal 3440x1440 resolution) looks far better than running DLAA at native 3440x1440. Ultrawide monitor is Ideal for Gaming. Sie ist viermal höher als die 1080p-Auflösung, die lange Zeit die Standardauflösung für die meisten Computer-Monitore war. Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit. For gaming, ultrawide monitors generally have an advantage in terms of frame rates. 2560x1440 is about 16:9 aspect ratio 3440x1440 is about 21:9 aspect ratio. This is a comparison of the performancce difference between the 16:9 3840x2160p resolution and the 32:9 5120x1440p resolution across 1 May 14, 2020 · Choisir un écran de 3440x1440 signifie que vous pourrez obtenir une excellente performance de jeu avec une carte graphique de milieu de gamme ou haut de gamme, comme la RTX 2060, contrairement aux RTX 2080 ou RTX2080 Ti, bien plus onéreuses, qui sont nécessaires pour la 4K native avec des fréquences d’images similaires. I went from 1080p to ultrawide 1440p and the performance didn't drop by much. e. Reply reply Ethernet-Splitter vs. Look up the performance differences at 4K right now for Death Stranding with DLSS enabled vs. I also have 48" 4k 120Hz OLED TV and I can use either displays for individual use cases. Is 2560 x 1440 considered 4k? Yes, you can call the 2560×1440 a 4k resolution. DLSS is better than TAA most of the time, but the blurring still exists. If the game is designed to use Hor+ FOV it's literally rendering more assets than 16:9. The aspect ratio of The 3440 x 1440 resolution is aspect ratio 21:9, which is ultrawide. See full list on displayninja. I know what you're trying to say but its a little extreme. Much prefer the higher refresh rate over the higher res. Just looks so sharp. I will take my 34 Alienware all day compared to the others. c) It's a better experience for gaming. Dec 19, 2024 · When comparing 4k resolution vs 3440x1440, several additional factors come into play beyond just pixel count and aspect ratio: Field of View Compared to the 4K’s aspect ratio (16:9), 3440x1440's ultra-wide aspect ratio (21:9) provides a panoramic view, which is ideal for monitoring large areas or wide spaces with fewer cameras. ) (Also Not sure why you're getting downvoted. Anyway 4K is the way to go, 4K takes a small adjustment, well all resolutions changes do. There's a near 30% performance hit when output resolution is changed from 1080p dlaa to 4k dlssp I have an update for anyone who has a similar problem and comes across this thread. For 144hz, see Gigabyte 4K or LG 27GN950-B 5120x1440p pretty close to the number of pixels as 4K. Jan 23, 2024 · Looking just at rasterization performance, AMD again gains a bit of ground on the 4070 Ti Super. Is 3440 x 1440 resolution 4k? The reason why 4K is not 3440×1440: 1440p Ultrawide vs 4K. Compared to 1080p, 4K sees a 60% performance drop Dec 19, 2024 · Lors de la comparaison entre la résolution 3440x1440 vs 4K, plusieurs facteurs supplémentaires entrent en jeu au-delà du simple nombre de pixels et du rapport d'aspect: Champ de Vision Comparé au rapport d'aspect du 4K (16:9), le rapport d'aspect ultra-large de 3440x1440 (21:9) offre une vue panoramique, idéale pour surveiller de grandes Nov 15, 2022 · This is definitely a card that wants a higher resolution monitor — 3440x1440 ultrawide would be a bit more demanding than 2560x1440, but 4K remains the better choice for non-ray tracing games. 4k vs Ultrawide. Jan 25, 2016 · Should you upgrade to 4K or an Ultrawide 3440 x 1440 high refresh rate display? In this video I hope to illustrate the performance difference between somethi Sep 23, 2024 · Performance Comparison: Ultrawide vs 4K. You will be fine in most of all cases, by the time your 11700K becomes a bottleneck to either a 3440x1440 monitor or a 4k 144hz monitor, you will be way over the target FPS for either or, for the 4K monitor the 4090 wont be there just yet in a lot of games except stuff like esports, cs go etc which will push way past 200fps before you bottleneck. Try 1080p DLAA vs 4k dlssp (1080p internal resolution). (I’ve found that MSFS shows roughly the same vertical space at 21:9 aspect ratio as it did at 16:9, it just shows more to the sides. 4k monitors are the king for image sharpness compared to 1080p and 1440p, which is the main advantage of those resolutions. Nov 12, 2024 · From 2020 onwards I've been sticking to 34" 3440x1440 resolution and recently upgraded to 240Hz OLED. Latest. I personally would choose 3440x1440 as I feel ultrawide gives more of a different experience than simply going to 4k. That's massive. I don't think I'm ready for 4k ultrawide monitor even at 2025+ until graphics card value significantly improves. 4K monitors demand more from your hardware due to the higher pixel count. My decision, as of now, is between the lg 34GN850 (UltraWide [3440 x 1440]) and the 27gn950 (Standard 16:9 [4K/144]). Ultrawide: Usage. Preis: Im Allgemeinen sind 4K-Monitore billiger als 3440 x 1440-Monitore, weil sie weit verbreitet sind und weil UltraWide-Auflösungen größere Bildschirme haben. Stepping down to 1440p, the RTX 3080 continues to dominate, but not quite as much as Check prices on Amazon belowLG 27GN950-B: https://geni. 3200 x 1440 ist zwar eine höhere Auflösung als Full HD, erfüllt aber nicht die spezifische Pixelanzahl, die für die Einstufung als 4K erforderlich ist. Aug 1, 2024 · Popular ultra-wide monitors use a widened 1440p resolution. 6× as much GPU power, I would think that the infinity cache should still have a fairly high hit rate with ultrawide so you should end up somewhere between 4090 and 4080 performance (vs 20% loss at 4k vs 4090). Especially in games that have DLSS. Jul 9, 2024 · Performance and Hardware Requirements. vip-gvgmall. Just go look up 4K benchmarks for the 2080 and that number will be close enough. 58 (58%) to get 2227 pixels. t. The recent improvements to balanced and performance modes are very impressive. Are there any other ultrawide peeps that have/want to upgrade to the latest generation and have advice for the 4080 vs 4090? Obviously 4090 has more power, but to actually get one I’d have to watch stock updates constantly for the few minutes it’s available. Nov 6, 2017 · I must say, 4K gaming is where ultimately it's at. If you have extra budget, see Samsung Odyssey G9 to get 140hz and 49 in 4K » ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q1A – 4k, 60hz, freesync, good entry level 4k gaming monitor. 2K: Explore the pros and cons of 2K and 4K resolutions for your specific needs. Correction: 3440x1440 is 60% 21:9 is more popular than 32:9. Benchmarks results are coming from much longer runs th I have a 34 Alienware OLed 3440x1440, also have a 38in IPS LG 3440x1600 and finally a 65 in LG 4K C1 TV. 4K ist eine Auflösung von 3840 x 2160 Pixeln, die auch als Ultra High Definition (UHD) bezeichnet wird. Le principal inconvénient d’un moniteur de jeu 4K est l’équipement et le coût requis pour faire fonctionner des jeux vidéo exigeants à 4K avec des paramètres et des fréquences d’images décents, en particulier lorsqu’il s’agit de moniteurs 4K à taux Let's say we have a 4K monitor, or 3840x2160 resolution. I'm curious about the performance "uplift" that I'd get gaming at 3840x1600 vs a traditional native 4K image (i. 3440x1440=4953600 pixels 2560x1440=3686400 pixels. I don't see any benefit for 4k vs 1440p tbh - whereas an ultrawide monitor really is significantly more immersive. You will have a general performance reduction as a ratio of total pixels. In terms of raw pixels, 3440x1440 is around 5m pixels whereas 4k is 8m which will have a noticeable impact on gaming performance. Opting for a 3440 x 1440 screen means you can get excellent game performance out of mid-to-high range graphics cards like the RTX 2060, as opposed to the much more expensive RTX 2080 or RTX 2080 Ti you’ll need for native 4K at similar framerates. Gsync/free sync is also important, makes a difference To be honest I didn’t really notice a difference in games at the lower res. 1440p will allow to lower hardware bar and use more It depends on your specific needs, budget, and the type of content you consume or create. 5K: Learn about the nuances between 4K and 5K resolutions and when each might be ideal. The 7900xtx gives me anxiety at 4k when you get used to the crazy frame rates on 1440p. For the past many years, most games were significantly GPU bottlenecked at 4k. Even at full 4K, it’s only 10 to 15 percent faster than the $700 GeForce RTX 3080, which costs less than half as much Apr 16, 2017 · Your Nvidia GTX 1080 graphics card is more than powerful enough for a 4K monitor, but if you don't plan on gaming heavily, you'll still enjoy great overall picture quality and smooth frame rates Mar 4, 2021 · 4k is a fake farce, NO TV you buy is 4k, they should be correctly called 2160p tv, but that don’t sound cool enough for the sellers, so they fake you into think your buying a 4k tv that’s 4x that of 1080p, nope just 2x as 1080p(BY their standard should be instead be called 2k), since it measure by THEIR standard at 1920, almost 2k just like Jan 16, 2025 · Try that in practice and you'll see that is simply not true. Apr 26, 2023 · 4K: 3840 x 2160 (typical monitor resolution); 4096 x 2160 (official cinema resolution) Ultra HD (UHD) 3840 x 2160: QHD aka WQHD aka 1440p: Serious value and high performance. click the link, go to fullscreen and you'll see how blurry 1080p DLAA is, compared to 4k dlssp. Refresh rate is an essential thing for a monitor, having a good refresh rate will provide you with smooth gameplay and a supreme streaming Jul 8, 2021 · I’m quite happy with a 3440x1440 ultrawide that’s a similar physical height to my previous 3840x2160 4k, just wider. Technical Comparison: 3440 x 1440 vs 4K Feb 15, 2016 · The most common 4K resolution (3840x2160) pushes ~8. Hell, you can do DLDSR up to 4K and DLSS Performance on a 1440p display and it will look significantly better than native or DLAA. Jan 12, 2022 · Moving from 1440p to 4K typically sees a 40 to 45 percent reduction in performance, and cards with less than 8GB of VRAM will struggle at times. (c) is totally debatable of course, and 4k allows you to get a bigger monitor (ie: >32") which might be better for working on. I probably spent 50% of my time just faffing and comparing settings as I find it all very interesting. Not sure if your PPD would change though (that one's important and based on distance). The other part is how many assets are on screen at one time. ly/3jEGjvx Digital Foundry YouTube: https://youtube. I think the video itself is "booty", but the comparison is a valid one that a lot of people (within this niche, anyway) would be interested in. Obviously it is the best 4k GPU and a lot of people buy it for that use case. Also, gamers will prefer 100 FPS from 1440p compared to 60 FPS at 4k. Sep 5, 2019 · 4k vs 3440x1440 Pixels. Also RSR inside of the AMD software if FSR is unavailable. 3686400/4953600 = ~0. The PC Considering that 3080 is much more powerful I believe it will be the best decision for you to buy 3440x1440, enjoy ultra in every game that exist at this point (except some horrors of optimization), keep getting great expirience a year or two and then either lower the settings or just lower resolution in settings to 2560x1080 - there is almost Jun 28, 2023 · The Nvidia RTX 4060 marks the return to true mainstream pricing, starting at $299. 4K offers unparalleled detail for media consumption and professional work, while 3440 x 1440 provides a wider field of view and can be more performance-friendly for gaming. This is all based on gaming, mind. I had tried both an UW and a 4k monitor and, to me, the clear winner is the 4k display. The 4070 and 4070 ti also interest me and can probably get reasonable performance at ultrawide but the 12 gb vram concerns me at this resolution. Anyone debating 21:9 vs 4k, or debating upgrading from 21:9 to 4k, will be much more interested in the real world performance differences than someone looking at 32:9. Of course benchmarks should tell the real story. It's not "just" about the pixel count, remember that performance doesn't scale linearly - 4k is technically 4x 1080p (in pixels), but you don't get 400% performance at 1080p vs 4k in most games. Of course, the only drawback is 60hz vs 100 or 144hz. 3440x1440 is not 4k so performance wise although it will drop from 2560x1440 it wont be that bad. rendering at native resolution. 1 Certified Fiber Optic Cable This clip comes from DF InDirect #1 - our Supporter-only Q+A show Support us on Patreon! https://bit. For my uses, definitely the 3440x1440. 4K will give you a small increase in sharpness while relying less on AA but will also require you to rely on DLSS/FSR and buy a much more powerful GPU. 2. Conversely, you could use dldsr to get a 4K like image on a 1440p monitor, though it works better in some games than others and is 3-7% more demanding than native 4K. I play on native 4k/60 on my oled downstairs but use DLSS Bananced on my 3440x1440 175hz monitor to gain some fps headroom. Jun 9, 2021 · How hard is it to run games at 21:9 ultrawide resolutions like 3440x1440 or 2560x1080? How does performance compare with standard resolutions like 1080p, 144 Because I'm not. 3440x1440 has 4. What I didn't say is that 21:9 3440x1440 it ever is more demanding than 4k 16:9. They are worlds apart. The LG would be much easier to drive, which is a priority for me. I have been testing 4k recently as wanted to move away from 3440x1440. May 15, 2020 · Meanwhile, most 4K gaming monitors still stick to 60Hz unless you go for more premium models. us/q0bwZNLG 38WN95-C: https://geni. Gaming or working in 4K requires a more powerful GPU compared to 1440p Ultrawide. Watch in 4K for reasonable quality. If you value a wider aspect ratio and immersive experience, 3440 x 1440 may be a better choice. Switch: Der ultimative Vergleich Wie scharf ist das menschliche Sehen im Vergleich zu 4K- und 8K-Displays Der Komfort von warmem Licht vs. Not only just playing in general because for the most part all do, but in terms of like mov Dec 21, 2022 · But, the quality of a 4K monitor just beats any 3440x1440 monitor, and any ultrawide monitor with a higher vertical resolution at this point is way too pricy for the average consumer. It's very underrated. For example in a game where you would have 60 FPS at 3440x1440 you will only have 49 at 3840x1600. Nov 6, 2014 · Given a 27" 4K monitor, you don't have to play at 4K if the performance is too low. When it comes to performance, both ultrawide and 4K displays have their strengths and challenges. Oh I definitely understand the price hike! I definitely think I'd go for a 34" UWQHD over a 4k UW display. 8K: A detailed breakdown of the distinctions between 4K and 8K resolutions. Performance difference between 3440x1440 and 3840x2160 resolutions. DLDSR at 2. 75 which is about a 25% performance drop. 6× as many pixels will take approximately 1. You’ll be fine! Get 20% discount with my "SKAG" code :DWindows10 -- https://www. During discussions in the last two years with many who had to start working from home due to the pandemic, it became clear that numerous people developed a " home Oct 30, 2020 · The $500 GeForce RTX 3070 provides 3440x1440 ultrawide performance roughly on a par with last generation's $1,200 RTX 2080 Ti, but don't discount memory differences. The term refers to PC monitors but not 4k because it has horizontal pixels much less than in 2000. & my MSI 32" MPG321UR-QD 4K HDR600 (HDR CRAP ON THIS!) 144hz e. 95 Mega Pixels total(110 PPI @ 34") versus 8. The choice between the two often depends on the specific use case and the hardware powering the display. I'd guess you'll probably average about 30-40FPS depending on the game and the settings. It is noticeable as this kind of a difference can easily be the difference between hitting the performance goal and missing it. Yeah quite surprised how it bottlenecks cpus at 4k too on some games. To take a look at GPUs from a power perspective, we’re using UL’s 3DMark Fire Strike 4K stress test, and the PC plugged into a Kill-A-Watt to monitor full system power draw. DLAA helps but it isn’t perfect. You can definitely tell the difference vs 1440p, and 3440x1440 as well after you're used to it. Monitor 4k Vs. Not too surprising considering a 3800x would bottleneck even a 2080 Ti in certain games at 4k (example: BF 5). The resolution of 4K is about four thousand pixels. I guess 3440x1440 is about 30% more than 1440p but 60% less than 4K. I've been running a DLDSR/DLSS combo for a year now since dropping from my 4K monitor to a 3440x1440 QDOLED. That said, it's close enough to 4k that it's a reasonable litmus. Just wanted to chine in that one annoyance that I didn't think about prior is if the games you play consider these resolutions. BF2042 4k slightly lowered settings 110fps, my 1440p ultra-wide hits 165fps 95% of the time. Yeah I haven't been able to get a good hands on experience with a 4k display to compare it to a 1440p monitor at smaller screen sizes. Sep 12, 2020 · I'm actually in the same dilemma right now. Here, the 32” 4k monitor tale the lead, so 1-1, huh? Let’s find out the next one. The 34" 1440P has better DPI (110 vs 105) but both should be good enough. Nov 24, 2023 · Wie der Name schon andeutet, ist die UltraWide-Auflösung mit ihrem Seitenverhältnis von 21:9 breiter als die Standard-Bildschirmbreite von 4K mit 16:9. Yes I went from 4k@60hz fixed to curved 3440x1440@200hz gsync. So if your card is powerful, which your 4070 is, 4k DSR/DLSS is just an added bonus. I was just about to pull the trigger on the said UltraWide, however, read where a lot of Multiplayer games are intentionally nerfing the FOV for UltraWide. Feb 12, 2021 · Hi all, I'm in the market for either an ultrawide QHD or 4k gaming monitor (currently on an ASUS QHD 16:9 g-sync monitor). 34-inch ultra-wide monitors have a 3440x1440 resolution, which works out to about 110 PPI. Since the "Balanced" preset is 58% per axis (58% vertical and 58% horizontal): DLSS will take the horizontal pixel count of 3840 and multiply it by 0. 4080 is more in stock, but as y’all know the price to performance is a little iffy. Other things to keep in mind include HDR, response time and VRR performance. Pixel count isn't literally everything but it's most of it. The additional clarity and sharpness far outweighs the broader aspect ratio of an ultrawide in terms of both usefulness and immersion. Size and aspect ratio: Aug 5, 2020 · I prefer the extra field of view going with an ultrawide vs standard widescreen. 4K bezieht sich auf eine Auflösung von 3840 x 2160 Pixeln, die viermal so viele Pixel wie Full HD (1920 x 1080) bietet. Meanwhile, 49-inch ultra-wide monitors have Mar 20, 2025 · Is 3440x1440 better than 4k? The "better" resolution depends on your specific needs and priorities. us/A3hBuPMLG 38GL950G-B: http Aug 3, 2023 · You should look for a 4k monitor if: You crave sharp image and text clarity. us/qNJV2JELG 27GL850-B: https://geni. So the best ultrawide monitor seems to be the 3440x1440 144hz LG 34GN850 (not taking into account the insanely expensive ones which cost over 2000 euro), but after doing some research I found another monitor that really got my attention: the LG 27GN950, a 4K 144hz monitor. Apr 5, 2023 · 4k is not supported and is a bit hard to run. You can drop the resolution and it won't really look that bad. May 7, 2021 · We took a look at 1080p and 1440p gaming across a wide range of current-gen GPUs a few weeks ago, and now, we're going to dive back in, but with a focus on 4K and ultrawide (3440x1440). com Jul 20, 2020 · 3440x1440 is ultrawide, but takes more GPU horsepower because it has more picelx, not because it's ultrawide. Dec 1, 2020 · It’s not a worthwhile upgrade for most folks on a standard 1440p monitor, offering just 9- to 13-percent more performance than the RTX 3060 Ti while costing 25 percent more, but that uplift Because of the PS5 I will go with the 42" 4k. 3840x1600 at 38" is the same PPI as the 34". Jan 9, 2025 · 4K vs. I saw lots of advice to take advantage of 4k DSR on 1440p monitors, claiming the image would be much better without losing much performance. I have a feeling people will be surprised by how well the DLSS 2. For work and prefer the 34" UltraWide, I can fit two windows nicely, originally I though with a 4K screen I will devide the screen in 4 corners but in practice I ended up not doing that and would split them on the left and right side which while the TV was bigger it ended up Jun 9, 2021 · To wrap up our performance look at standard games, Legion shows the RTX 3070 Ti to be better than the RTX 3070 by 4 FPS at both resolutions. It’s much more demanding to run a 5120x1440 display than a 3440x1440 so gaming performance is generally closer to 4k than 3440x1440 due to the additional pixels you calculated in an earlier comment. Similar performance and picture resolution because I used to have to run MSFS on the 4K monitor at 70%-80% render scaling anyway. This is a comparison of the performance difference between the 16:9 2560x1440p resolution and the 21:9 3440x1440p resolution across 15 games and 7 GPUs. Its THAT large of a difference. 0 enabled games will run, and we're about to enter an age where we start to become more CPU limited than ever. What I read was on 4k games are going to be entirely dependent on the GPU. 4K vs. By TheGlenlivet September 5, as far as performance goes, yes 1. 4K is 67% more pixels. Also, the difference in iq between native 4K vs dldsr 4K is much greater than 1440p on a native 1440p display vs 1440p on a 4K display. It can be used for gaming purposes because of its amazing The difference is around 20%. Dec 23, 2024 · Nein, 3200 x 1440 ist keine 4K-Auflösung. Bildwiederholfrequenz:. 3840x2160). Best combo of performance and value. On the other hand, an ultrawide monitor is used for gaming and for viewing videos. just slightly behind at 1440p), while the 7900 XTX is 20% faster Pour commencer, nous nous concentrerons sur les aspects négatifs des deux types de moniteurs afin de vous faciliter le choix. With that difference, I'd pick the 34" for extra performance. Alot of comments I've read mirror your sentiment that it's harder to tell the difference. Power Consumption. 3. This is certainly not the best way to depict it, but I took a photo of a game running at 2560x1440, 2954x1662, and 3840x2160 at When people say 5120x1440 is close to 4k they’re talking about the demand on your gpu and remaining components. That should give some perspective on DLSS is absolute insanity. This means that displays from 4K will be of better quality than that of 3440 x 1440. This is a comparison of the performancce difference between the 16:9 3840x2160p resolution and the 21:9 3440x1440p resolution across 15 game Nov 17, 2023 · This is especially true for tasks like 4K gaming or video editing, where the graphics card and processor play critical roles in maintaining smooth performance. 3440x1440 offers roughly 40% better performance compared to 4K. QHD is the same resolution, as UWQHD but it is less wide, which makes it the standard 16:9 which i m sure works well, i m on 16:9 full hd rn (my monitor is 12 years old, makes a little bit of x rays and has vaporized mercury as backlighting). isfd uweb qnbyx aam pfjwif xnvzg hhqd nziibx npely swmmgp bgevfoj zuscuf arrdfzb qdhmv ejpg